In this final installment of my conversation with veteran songwriting consultant John Braheny, John gives advice about making a living as a solo singer-songwriter, how to maximize your songwriting output even if you have outside responsibilities such as a job and family, and the best ways to seek out and secure publishing deals. I’d like to thank John for sharing his decades of music industry experience with Serve The Song. We really appreciate your insights! – Mary Shaw
11. Is it possible for a solo singer-songwriter to make a living completely online, or is it still necessary to tour and get as much publicity as possible?
Big question and a good one. It is possible for a singer-songwriter to make a living completely online, but the odds aren’t as good and it takes a lot of work and creative marketing. You need to be able to drive potential fans to your website or wherever you’re selling your music.
Touring is one of the best ways to generate fans. There’s nothing quite as powerful as connecting with your audience in person. If they like what they experience they’ll want to take home your CD as a memory. You want them to go to your site, get on your mailing list and you want to create as much contact with them as possible. That means blogging, using Facebook, Twitter and other social media networks frequently, coming up with special deals for fans, like bonus tracks, works in progress they can have input on, discounts on merchandise and concerts etc. Even if you are touring, it’s still tough to “make a living completely.” It helps if you can find compatible sponsors for the tour.
If you’re not touring it means you have to generate income and publicity about yourself in other ways. One of those ways is to get your songs and instrumental tracks into films and TV shows, video games, commercials or for other uses that pay licensing fees and royalties. Another is to gain expertise in production and write for/with other artists.
12. Let’s talk about output for a minute. Obviously the more you write, the better you’ll get. But given the other responsibilities faced by many singer-songwriters such as day jobs, families, etc., what is a reasonable amount of output that an aspiring singer-songwriter can expect to make without going crazy? Should they aim to write one song a week, one a day, two-three a month? What’s reasonable?
What’s reasonable varies widely. All those factors you mention have variables. How supportive is your spouse? Will he/she support time for you to spend a couple of hours a night by yourself without making you feel guilty? Are you willing to allow your spouse the same consideration?
You also have to make quality time for your spouse and kids – share what you create with them so they can see/hear what that creative space you request has produced. You’ll model for them that they deserve to have their own private time to create.
As for the numbers, I’ve known people with day jobs and families who can still create a song a week and produce at least a rough demo. Others just take a whole lot longer. There’s no getting around the fact that it’s always a difficult juggle. But don’t use your family and job obligations as excuses for not writing. You can write while you’re in line at the bank, commuting, and in any number of common circumstances. Keep a digital recorder and notepad with you. I did a seminar recently and a 13-yr-old was in the front row taking quick notes on her iPhone. (Or was she texting her friends??)
13. What is the future of music publishing? Should writers aim to keep their own publishing or look for deals?
Music publishing will continue as long as there is music to be licensed and royalties to be collected. It’s just a question of whether you’re capable of exploiting your own music (finding income generating uses for it) or whether you want help with it.
The royalty collection part is extremely important because over half your income may be generated outside the U.S., which means you will need an administration deal with an experienced international administration company to collect on your behalf. In this situation you’d keep your publishing and hire an admin company for typically about 15% of what they collect.
My general advice (much more detail in the book) is to hold on to your publishing rights unless you get something very valuable in return. That might include financing and shopping master recordings, giving you advances to live on while you’re writing songs, and giving up limited publishing income (but not ownership) for someone to do film/TV placement.
Generally speaking, if you’re a writer/artist/band actively looking for a record deal, keep your publishing. You may need it as part of the deal. If you’re a songwriter only, finding a good publisher may be a good situation for you.
14. Are services like TAXI and Pump Audio still viable in light of all the recent changes in the music business?
Very much so, especially if they’re as trusted by the industry as TAXI to pre-screen the material so it’s high quality and appropriate for the requests. There are always producers and record company A&R people looking for songs and artists, managers looking for artists, film/TV music supervisors and music libraries looking for songs and instrumental tracks, and publishers looking for songs and writers. Those services can really help indie writers exploit their songs and keep the publishing in most cases.
15. What do you think about selling songs to royalty-free music providers like AudioJungle.net?
AudioJungle is an Australian company and I believe you receive a 40-70% commission from the music that they sell to users on your behalf. Generally speaking, royalty-free music means that a user pays a one-time fee and can either sell unlimited units of the same work or, depending on the contract, may use up to, say, 5000 units without additional fees.
A better deal for you is that the end user has to file a cue sheet with your Performing Rights Organization (PRO) – ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC (in the U.S.) so you’ll get paid a royalty for its continued use. One factor that will shape your decision is how valuable that piece of music is to you. If it’s an instrumental track that you don’t think you’d have another use for and you need the cash, you might go for it. If it’s a song that’s dear to your heart, you’ll probably want to maintain ownership and license it so you get an up front sync fee and “back end” payments from your PRO. This is a time when these services are evolving with varieties of new business models. As a copyright owner you can make any kind of deal you want. My advice is to read the contract very carefully, though.
In case you missed them, check out part 1 and part 2 of this interview and leave your thoughts in the comments.







