Today I came across a fantastic opinion post called In Defense Of The Album, where Scott Perry makes a very compelling argument for sticking with the full-length album format over succumbing to the single mp3 download trend happening in today’s music industry.
His piece is mainly focused on the financial aspect, which I totally agree with. He makes the point that a single hot mp3 download may generate some quick sales at a $1 a piece, but they won’t generate large concert ticket sales or long-term fan loyalty.
Here’s a quick excerpt from the article:
I see the single (cover your eyes mom) as a booty call – sure, it’s fun, and you go back to it again and again until the novelty wears off, but if you want a RELATIONSHIP with the artist, then you get the album — you WANT to take that 45-minute journey into that band’s world.
Read the full article here.
The Creativity Angle
Taking the defense of the album format a step further – I believe it’s essential to realize a band’s full creativity in the form of a full-length album. 45 minutes or more of music can completely display the dynamic range of an artist’s voice, opinions, styles, and creative direction. You can’t tell the whole store in a single 3 minute mp3 – no matter how great the song is.
An album is an event. It should be painstakingly crafted from rough takes to the final mix. This extended effort is appreciated by fans – both new and old. A great album stays in heavy rotation in music lover’s iPods for a very long time. You can’t say that about a great single, which may be repeated for a month but then forgotten.
Related posts:
- What to Call Your Release – Demo, EP, or Album?
- Go-to Album Review: Elliot Smith, Figure 8
- The Importance of Using Scratch Tracks in Recording and Music Production
- Evolving the Sound vs. Sticking to the Formula
- Recording Your Indie Album: a Pre-Production Checklist
Enjoyed reading this post?
Get articles sent to you via EMAIL or RSS (what’s RSS?)
Thanks for being part of the conversation at Serve The Song. We have a simple comment policy (with thanks to Tim Ferriss) - critical is fine, but if you’re rude we'll delete your stuff. ’Nuff said.







04/9/2009
6:33 pm
Donnie Brasco
True indeed!
05/17/2009
1:13 am
Whatnot
LPs (and later CDs) benefitted record companies, by and large, far more than artists. Someone wiht a calculator — between 1964 and today: how many great LPs were made? Precious few, IMO. I look forward to the new economy where causual listeners can buy a track or two by an artist, rather than an album that’s 50-75% filler. That arragement benefits no one, certainly not old-school song writers (who went the way of the dodo after Dylan and the Beatles introduced the auteur theory to rock). LPs’ chief benefit was providing a mobile platform for separating pot from seeds. Good riddance.